Recently, due to the commercialization of several projects to varying degrees, a common appeal is particularly obvious: how to tap considerable commercial value from executive list project resources. These cross-industry projects come from the fields of education, media, and enterprise services. But in fact, the problem encountered is a general industry executive list problem, that is, the commercialization of resource-based projects. Further, how to design matching commercial products to achieve business (realization) goals. We know that in executive list conventional product design, in order to achieve the commercial goals of the product.
It is necessary to find its PMF, and in commercial realization, what is the different logic for the search for PMF? First of all, let’s talk about the concept of PMF: the abbreviation of Product Market Fit, which means that the product and market demand executive list reach the best fit point, meet the needs of users and can meet certain index requirements (such as reaching a certain user scale, revenue scale, profit scale, etc.) , then this product complies with PMF. Finding PMF is the most important thing for almost all companies, especially entrepreneurs. From executive list a practical point of view, the search logic in commercialization is very different from the traditional market-driven PMF.
Differences in PMF in commercialization According to the business logic driven by traditional market demand, our idea of finding PMF executive list should be as follows: First, we must find your target customers, analyze their unmet needs, what value your products can create for customers, and how to design a The MVP product was quickly put on the executive list market, repeatedly verified and iterated, and finally found the PMF. In the field of practice in the past, this style of play has been very useful. Especially in the consumer sector, almost all brands focus on finding PMF when developing new products, and there are many successful brands.